Apex Court Emphasizes Impartial Investigation Amidst Public Scrutiny
The Supreme Court has backed a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the death of Twisha Sharma, finding itself "pained" by claims that the judiciary might have shielded the accused. The court explicitly urged both families involved, as well as the media, to cease public statements that could potentially prejudice the ongoing investigation.
The court stressed the necessity of a fair and impartial inquiry to maintain public confidence. The Madhya Pradesh government's recommendation for a CBI investigation was appreciated by the bench, which acknowledged the high court's prior directive for a second post-mortem examination.
families and Media Asked to Refrain from Public Statements
The bench, comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi, stated that family members should present their accounts to the investigating authorities directly, rather than to the media. This directive aims to prevent any adverse impact on the legal proceedings. The court specifically requested that statements from the victim's family not be reduced to "sound bites," noting that certain public pronouncements had caused distress.
Read More: NEET Exam Paper Leak: Accused Shubham Khairnar Held Until June 6, 2026
Samarth Singh, the victim's husband and a lawyer, was reportedly on the run for ten days before his arrest. His mother, Giribala Singh, a former district judge, has faced allegations of ignoring police notices regarding the investigation, a claim she denies. Sharma's family has alleged a delay in the First Information Report (FIR) registration and a failure by the state police to preserve crucial evidence.
Background: A Case Marked by Allegations and Legal Scrutiny
Twisha Sharma, 33, was discovered hanging in her matrimonial home in Bhopal on May 12. Her family has leveled accusations of mental harassment and financial demands against her husband, Samarth Singh, and his mother, Giribala Singh. The family has also pointed to disturbing chat messages exchanged with Twisha, detailing her distress, feelings of being trapped, and allegations that her husband questioned the paternity of their unborn child and pressured her to consider abortion.
Read More: Freeman Shootout: No Body Camera Footage From Officers
The Madhya Pradesh government's move to recommend a CBI probe followed these escalating concerns and a period of rapid developments, including CCTV footage controversies and bail disputes. The state Chief Minister, Mohan Yadav, assured Sharma's family that the government would pursue a CBI inquiry. Earlier, a magistrate court had rejected the family's plea for a second autopsy at AIIMS Delhi, citing jurisdictional issues, but ordered the police to ensure proper preservation of the body.
The Supreme Court’s suo motu cognizance of the case underscores the gravity of the situation, brought about by public outrage and the complexities surrounding the allegations of dowry harassment and abetment to suicide. The court has taken note of the Solicitor General's assurance that a decision on transferring the investigation to the CBI would be made imminently.
Read More: Convicted Nurse RaDonda Vaught Speaks on Patient Safety
